International Boxing Organization
International Boxing Organization
Edward S. Levine
John Daddono
Chairman, Championships Committee
Jeremy D. Levine
Vice President
Robert Balogh
Vice President
Hilton Whitaker, III
Vice President IBO
U.S.B.O. President
Andre VanGrootenbruel
Vice President, Europe
Jorge M. Alonso
Vice President, Latin America
Len Hunt
Vice President, Africa
Steve Scott
Vice President, Asia Pacific
Maria Canizares
President's Assistant
Frank Brunette
Chairman, Official's and Grievance Committee
Gregory Reed, M.D.
Medical Advisor
Eric D. Plescow
Executive Assistant
John McDonald
U.K. Press Representative
Vuyani Bungu
Special Ambassador - Africa
Fight Commissioners:
Garry Dean
Chuck Giampa
Frank Hadley
Gary Ingraham
Luthando Jack
Ramiro Ortiz
Charlie Payne
Kiate Sirigul
Peter Zamoyski
Benedetto Montella

Edward B. Raduns


The IBO, Prominent Champions and Top 100 Computerized Rankings
(IBO Editorial)

The I.B.O. congratulates Wladimir Klitschko on his stunning knockout victory over Tony Thompson in Hamburg, Germany. The continuing and growing pattern of the best boxers such as Wladimir Klitschko, Ricky Hatton, and Antonio Tarver fighting for I.B.O. titles is partly the result of the I.B.O.'s belief that top-flight boxers, promoters and managers the sport's truly frontline people need not have a sanctioning body dictate to them just whom they will fight next. They have discovered the importance of staying independent, which the I.B.O. is unique in offering.

The I.B.O. believes that television networks which showcase boxing are in a better position than sanctioning bodies to match fighters in bouts that will attract the most public interest, and thus make for competitive fights. The I.B.O. also gives more latitude to its champions to determine their next opponent. We exercise veto authority over a fight only when it appears to be a mismatch, as determined by our computer rankings. This is in stark contrast to some sanctioning bodies, which often insist on playing matchmaker and decision-maker over a champion's future. This obviously has resulted in much controversy within the sport when a champion is forced to fight a "political mandatory," meaning a fight arranged for something far less than the best of reasons, or as former I.B.O. champion Lennox Lewis called it, "politricks". From its inception, the I.B.O.'s mandate has been to bring more honesty, ethics and credibility to boxing, and some common sense, too. It has been quite an undertaking to establish objective, comprehensive computerized rankings, but it clearly has been worth it, and will continue to set the I.B.O. apart from other sanctioning bodies.

In coming months, I.B.O. Championships will be on the line in the U.S.A., Germany, England, Australia, and South Africa.

Some say the I.B.O. is too new a sanctioning body to have major recognition in boxing, but we say what does age have to do with finding a better way and doing business with credibility and integrity? We believe that boxing can change from within. Boxing is a business. Poorly run sanctioning bodies should pay the consequences, and for too long in boxing, they have not had to do so. Boxing needs change, positive change. Certainly, we do not need more sanctioning bodies; rather, we need a healthy one to supplant some of the sick ones clogging up the sport. We at the I.B.O. will let our independent premier champions and promoters with foresight, as well as, our computerized rankings, uniform rules, and contribution towards the betterment of the sport over the coming years speak for itself.

Return to previous page

   International Boxing Organization, 340 Minorca Ave. Coral Gables, FL 33134
(305) 446-0684   Fax: (305) 446-2973   Website:   E-Mail:

Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use

   Copyright © 2013 IBO. All Rights Reserved.

  Web design & development by AdServices Inc.